What’s your lasting impression on people? If you consider that every artist believes that their art is their lasting impression then how does thinking outside the box help you to differentiate yourself?

I was speaking with a business associate on the phone the other day and we were discussing art, of course, and he told me of a particular piece he had ordered online and received in the mail.

One might expect that he was describing the beauty of the artwork or possibly about the technical merit of the artist, but that was not the case. What he did tell, me right off the bat, was about the delivery of the fine art.

The piece was wrapped in a “nice vellum” as he put it. Nothing too extraordinary, but just enough to leave a good lasting impression.

In marketing, it should be noted that there are pretty standard ideas behind customer service. Bad customer service can expect to be spread to approximately 20 people from one experience. While great customer service can expect to be spread to only 5. Some studies will suggest, however, that extraordinary customer service, the kind that far exceeds what the customer was expecting, will spread to 15 people.

This works because too many businesses are just fine with making the sale. The ones that succeed are the ones that understand great customer service doesn’t stop after money has changed hands.

As artists in the new media age we lose some of the face to face contact. People prefer to buy from people not businesses or corporations.

The idea behind “going the extra mile” isn’t new. How are people talking about you, your art, and your customer service?

Are they talking at all?

When I was a wedding and portrait photographer I would really work hard at finding ways to create word of mouth advertising. The best responses came from little extras that I would throw in for “free” without the client knowing about them ahead of time. Maybe it was a nice bottle of bubbly the day before the wedding or perhaps a surprise folio upon delivery of a package. These things were all left off of the price lists so that they would come as a surprise and make the client feel special.

The idea is to get the client talking differently about you. Most people will ask a newlywed about their wedding and services. Most of the time, the photographers were great, wonderful, okay, or worse. But I could get them to say that I was not only great, but that I was thoughtful and surprised them with a personal, touching, little something extra, then that was well worth the price of admission.

If you are a painter, could you sign one of your brushes used on that painting and throw it in for free? Would that cost you too much if your paintings are priced right? Would people talk about it? Be creative.

Gimmicky? Perhaps, but remember that what you don’t do to make yourself extraordinary makes you just plain ordinary.

Yes, your artwork should speak for itself. We all strive to produce art that has it’s own voice, but consider that adding a little something extra may give that work a little boost. An amplifier if you will. Could you wrap your artwork in a “nice vellum” before you hand it over to FedEx? Maybe throw in a few “marketing business cards” with a great design? What about a handwritten “thank you” note or a coupon for their next purchase?

Yes these things may cost a little extra, but if you keep that part of the overhead low, then you can just add it to the overall price and your profits don’t change a bit.

Make people talk about you in a positive way and you will see your fine art sales go up. Even in this digital age, you cannot beat the power of word of mouth.

Be extraordinary.

Often times the hardest part about multitasking is ensuring that everything gets done completely. This is something I’ve always struggled with. As I’ve gotten older I have gotten better, but still do find myself getting distracted or neglecting one task over another.

In the process of marketing and advertising my websites I’ve spent so much time online that I’ve neglected the process of photography itself. I’m terribly behind in my editing and haven’t pulled out my camera in a couple of days.

I’m working nights right now so I sleep all day missing the good light of the morning. This is when most of my work gets done as I’m not apt to leave my home at sunset very often because that’s family time.

Because my work schedule is pretty crazy I tend to ensure that when I am home in the evenings I stay home. Just trying to be a good dad and husband.

While I work nights I spend countless hours building my profiles on various social networking sites like Digg and StumbleUpon. This is pretty much the way you market and advertise blogs. Everything is linked to everything on every profile I have online. I’ve done a good job of ensuring that a google search of Damien Franco pulls up mostly my sites. Now of course, nobody googles my name that often, but as I build my profile and begin to do more guest posts on other blogs people will start to do that.

This is a basic look into some of the things I think about as I build my online profile. I have to control, to the best of my ability, what pops up when I’m googled.

This will be super important later when I’m more well known in both the art community and blogging community.

So now it’s time to get back to networking.

Photographers can fall into many arrays of category as their hobby or profession would designate.  As I work my way into the realm of Fine Art Photography it seems there is a buzz around the photo-blogosphere asking What is Fine Art Photography?

Defining myself as a Fine Art Photographer came with a deep look into many different aspects of this same question.

Was it the process?

The process of producing images takes on a whole different meaning than say “taking pictures”.  Conceptualizing an image from the moment of capture to print should, perhaps, maintain an integrity consistent with evoking feeling. The particular feelings produced by an image, possibly deemed “Fine Art”, don’t themselves define the print as art. The photographer deems works of art as art, but who agrees?

Is it the viewer?

I think there could be an argument that the viewer of the print, or image as it were, might in fact be the best judge of what should or shouldn’t be deemed Fine Art Photography. So what if the viewer isn’t classically trained in the aspects of aesthetics, design, or composition? Shouldn’t the general public define what is Fine Art in general? Hasn’t it always been so?

Not necessarily. In the past there has always been a small group of people that have pushed the artist before the general public. Before the vast expanses of the Internet we, as a society, were told who was an artist and who was a hack. Now, anyone with an Internet connection and some insight into social media marketing could potentially label themselves a Fine Artist. And if they successfully sell enough of their work to the general mass would that qualify them as a Fine Art Photographer?

Is there a need for validation?

I tend to think there is. But I come from a classically trained background in the world of art itself. While I have found many wonderful photographers with great skill and stunning vision I don’t necessarily think of them as Fine Art Photographers (at times I struggle to label myself in such a way). I still believe in a consensus of validation from those in the industry of Fine Art.

I believe, however, that you can label yourself as a Fine Art Photographer or produce work that is Fine Art Photography if you are placing yourself at the mercy of those who may be more qualified to validate your work (call it Fine Art Photographer in practice if you must). As I am in the process of getting together all of my prints into portfolios (you know, the real tangible and physical portfolios that you can hold) and making contacts in the industry, I will be submitting my work to panels, reviews, critics…

Does that make me a Fine Art Photographer in practice?

I think it does. One of the hardest parts of truly studying art as a profession is placing your soul on the table and letting the critics do their worst. It truly takes thick skin, an appreciation for the practice, and the ability to actually learn from an art critic. They truly do hold power in this industry and, while you will never please them all, your goal should in fact be to gain both their praise and acceptance. It truly can be an archaic process, but the tormented soul of an artist should be able to overcome all obstacles.

The upper echelon of the Fine Art World is no less competitive than any other industry. It should be held, in fact, to higher standards than most any other profession, for it can not be taught, it can only be honed. It has to be in you from the beginning.

But these are just my thoughts and questions.

Some might argue that these are tired ways and the modern view would change the Art World, turning it on its head (nose in the air and all). Maybe it will. I think the age of the Internet will in fact bring us a whole new slew of artists (some Fine Artists some not) and the world will be better for it. For right now though, you still have to get your physical portfolio into the hands of those few who can truly “put you on the map”.

The funny thing is that after you have successfully been deemed, by those in the industry, as a tried and true “Fine Artist” every work you have done prior to the acclaimed label is now acceptable as “Fine Art”.

If you’re lucky you won’t already be dead when this happens.

© 2010 Damien Franco On Photography Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha